
These pictures were taken in Apple Valley, MN, an ex-burb of Minneapolis that has come to exemplify, for me, the rotten core of America. Let me explain.
These structures cover, no, are the landscape for dozens of square miles south of the Minnesota River. The corn farmers sold out to the real estate speculators that swarmed out from the cities in the 90's. Corporate farming, much of it "headquartered" in the Twin Cities, had driven down the market prices for crops to the point where a developer's offer represented the only future a farm family had.
Look at what resulted. Fields of barracks.

These are called, "multi-family homes," which could also be called "high-density, high-profit land packing." Their design owes much to the television and the car. I suppose they are the logical step past the factory towns and tract homes of the 50's and 60's. They fill the need of the the modern American. Each has a two-car garage which is vital for two reasons. One, the SUV, the truck and the car define the American owner and need protection as their clothes need a closet. Look at the pictures, their "house" cannot offer them any definition. Two, the malls (there are no "shops"), the schools, their jobs are literally miles away. They cannot walk anywhere from here!
The television. It keeps them inside. Why should they act when they can watch, therefore why own a yard? Besides, a yard means yardwork and yardwork takes time away from television. A dilema the developers have solved by offering no yard at all.

The price of these homes surprised me, but not for long. They sell for more than my extended bungalow would which sits detached from any other house on one-third of a acre only two blocks from the city limits of Minneapolis proper. Why? Well, to start with, I live in a multi-ethnic neighborhood. Ah, yes.. I hear you say. Homogeneity: very important to a lot of people. Also, these dwellings are new. "New" counts for a lot in America. It is an attribute that beats quality, esthetics, value, etc. every time.

Yesterday I walked through one of these "houses" that was still unfinished. I shuffled through the building debris and examined the construction. The walls were flimsy and the craftmanship poor. Clearly the builder was counting on the drywall, paint and carpet to cover his sins. In fifty years the place might not even be standing but, I suppose, that's not the point. The property speculator, the developer, the builder and the mortgage company will have all made their profit and moved on. I'm sure that they try not to think of the lives that will have to be shoehorned into these stuctures that they have thrown up. Do they count on the occupants being as trancient as their foundations are weak? Do they assume these homes, in time, will be plowed under like the corn?
A depressing place furnished with ugly buildings built on all too common principles.
Recent Comments